You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, a superworker can only be triggered via perform_async class method call. I'd like to add my jobs via sidekiq-cron (https://github.com/ondrejbartas/sidekiq-cron) but sidekiq-cron uses the instance method perform entryway in order to kick off a job by putting it on the queue. This means that currently, i have to create a proxy job that kicks off the static superworker in order to get it enqueued correctly by sidekiq-cron. I'd love for the ability to just kick it off from sidekiq-cron directly. What work would be required for that? I'd be willing to make the pull request if you had a way to point me where to start. Seems like WorkerClass would be the entry point?
Cheers,
Ian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now, a superworker can only be triggered via perform_async class method call. I'd like to add my jobs via sidekiq-cron (https://github.com/ondrejbartas/sidekiq-cron) but sidekiq-cron uses the instance method perform entryway in order to kick off a job by putting it on the queue. This means that currently, i have to create a proxy job that kicks off the static superworker in order to get it enqueued correctly by sidekiq-cron. I'd love for the ability to just kick it off from sidekiq-cron directly. What work would be required for that? I'd be willing to make the pull request if you had a way to point me where to start. Seems like WorkerClass would be the entry point?
Cheers,
Ian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: