-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
/
Copy path055.py
executable file
·37 lines (25 loc) · 1.57 KB
/
055.py
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
#!/usr/bin/python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
#If we take 47, reverse and add, 47 + 74 = 121, which is palindromic.
#Not all numbers produce palindromes so quickly. For example,
#349 + 943 = 1292,
#1292 + 2921 = 4213
#4213 + 3124 = 7337
#That is, 349 took three iterations to arrive at a palindrome.
#Although no one has proved it yet, it is thought that some numbers, like 196, never produce a palindrome. A number that never forms a palindrome through the reverse and add process is called a Lychrel number. Due to the theoretical nature of these numbers, and for the purpose of this problem, we shall assume that a number is Lychrel until proven otherwise. In addition you are given that for every number below ten-thousand, it will either (i) become a palindrome in less than fifty iterations, or, (ii) no one, with all the computing power that exists, has managed so far to map it to a palindrome. In fact, 10677 is the first number to be shown to require over fifty iterations before producing a palindrome: 4668731596684224866951378664 (53 iterations, 28-digits).
#Surprisingly, there are palindromic numbers that are themselves Lychrel numbers; the first example is 4994.
#How many Lychrel numbers are there below ten-thousand?
#NOTE: Wording was modified slightly on 24 April 2007 to emphasise the theoretical nature of Lychrel numbers.
#Answer:
#249
from time import time; t=time()
c = 0
for n in range(10000):
x, s = n, int(str(n)[::-1])
for i in range(50-1):
x += s
s = int(str(x)[::-1])
if x == s: break
else:
c += 1
print(c)#, time()-t