You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As initially reported in this thread , applying the summary(mod, robust=TRUE) to a model estimated by felm will return zero-valued standard errors for terms that are otherwise NA because of rank-deficiency.
In the example below, I think it would make more sense for the standard errors to be NA for the first three terms:
library(lfe)
set.seed(1234)
n <- 1000
example <- data.frame(
outcome = rnorm(n),
month = sample(1:12, n, replace = TRUE),
running = sample(1:50, n, replace = TRUE))
example$post <- example$month > 6
example$treatment1 <- example$running > 25
example$treatment2 <- example$running > 40
mod <- felm(outcome ~ treatment1 * post + treatment2 * post |
month + running,
data = example)
#> Warning in chol.default(mat, pivot = TRUE, tol = tol): the matrix is either
#> rank-deficient or indefinite
summary(mod, robust=TRUE)
#> Warning in chol.default(mat, pivot = TRUE, tol = tol): the matrix is either
#> rank-deficient or indefinite
#>
#> Call:
#> felm(formula = outcome ~ treatment1 * post + treatment2 * post | month + running, data = example)
#>
#> Residuals:
#> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
#> -3.2371 -0.6478 -0.0002 0.6151 2.9811
#>
#> Coefficients:
#> Estimate Robust s.e t value Pr(>|t|)
#> treatment1TRUE NA 0.00000 NA NA
#> postTRUE NA 0.00000 NA NA
#> treatment2TRUE NA 0.00000 NA NA
#> treatment1TRUE:postTRUE -0.05536 0.14777 -0.375 0.708
#> postTRUE:treatment2TRUE -0.14059 0.18224 -0.771 0.441
#>
#> Residual standard error: 0.997 on 937 degrees of freedom
#> Multiple R-squared(full model): 0.06278 Adjusted R-squared: 0.0007696
#> Multiple R-squared(proj model): 0.001447 Adjusted R-squared: -0.06463
#> F-statistic(full model, *iid*):1.012 on 62 and 937 DF, p-value: 0.4519
#> F-statistic(proj model): 0.2713 on 5 and 937 DF, p-value: 0.9289
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As initially reported in this thread , applying the
summary(mod, robust=TRUE)
to a model estimated byfelm
will return zero-valued standard errors for terms that are otherwiseNA
because of rank-deficiency.In the example below, I think it would make more sense for the standard errors to be
NA
for the first three terms:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: