-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What is the license for the graphics and artwork? #2
Comments
i haven't given this any consideration, and from a quick look it looks like i'll need to do some research. i'm okay with the images being used in commercial or non commercial applications with proper attribution. what do other plugin authors typically use for this kind of scenario? |
Many Rack modules don't specify and then one would say that these resources fall under the same license as the source-code. In your case that would be "GPL-3.0-or-later". It is certainly not required to have a specific license just for the resources. |
thanks! does that work for cardinal or does it require images to use a different licence? |
@scanner-darkly not at all. We have a bunch of modules that don't specify artwork license and then it is assumed that the entire project falls under the source license. See: https://github.com/DISTRHO/Cardinal/blob/main/docs/LICENSES.md#artwork--panel-licenses We simply asked @rl2939 to note this down in the LICENSES.md file, but I think they misunderstood. |
No, the images do not need to be a different license.
Oh, oops. I misread the comment as "the plugin here does not have an artwork license, please ask for the artwork license info". Should I close the ticket? |
What is the license for the graphics and artwork? (This is everything under the
res
directory.) Is this the under the same license as the software license, under a Creative Commons type license such asCC BY-SA
, or something else?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: