Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the license for the graphics and artwork? #2

Open
rl2939 opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

What is the license for the graphics and artwork? #2

rl2939 opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@rl2939
Copy link

rl2939 commented Jan 1, 2025

What is the license for the graphics and artwork? (This is everything under the res directory.) Is this the under the same license as the software license, under a Creative Commons type license such as CC BY-SA, or something else?

@scanner-darkly
Copy link
Owner

i haven't given this any consideration, and from a quick look it looks like i'll need to do some research.

i'm okay with the images being used in commercial or non commercial applications with proper attribution. what do other plugin authors typically use for this kind of scenario?

@dromer
Copy link

dromer commented Jan 3, 2025

Many Rack modules don't specify and then one would say that these resources fall under the same license as the source-code.

In your case that would be "GPL-3.0-or-later".

It is certainly not required to have a specific license just for the resources.
Only when you want to restrict their specific use.

@scanner-darkly
Copy link
Owner

thanks! does that work for cardinal or does it require images to use a different licence?

@dromer
Copy link

dromer commented Jan 13, 2025

@scanner-darkly not at all. We have a bunch of modules that don't specify artwork license and then it is assumed that the entire project falls under the source license.

See: https://github.com/DISTRHO/Cardinal/blob/main/docs/LICENSES.md#artwork--panel-licenses

We simply asked @rl2939 to note this down in the LICENSES.md file, but I think they misunderstood.

@rl2939
Copy link
Author

rl2939 commented Jan 13, 2025

thanks! does that work for cardinal or does it require images to use a different licence?

No, the images do not need to be a different license.

We simply asked @rl2939 to note this down in the LICENSES.md file, but I think they misunderstood.

Oh, oops. I misread the comment as "the plugin here does not have an artwork license, please ask for the artwork license info".

Should I close the ticket?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants