You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While fixing #186, I noticed that there's an implicit assumption that atomics are trivially initializable. This is fine since it's true on all the architectures we currently support, but in the future we should either check that this is true or remove the assumption. The easiest way is probably just to assert somewhere in the configure script that (in C++11) static_assert(std::is_trivially_constructible<std::atomic<std::uintptr_t>>::value, "Trivially initializable atomics are required.")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While fixing #186, I noticed that there's an implicit assumption that atomics are trivially initializable. This is fine since it's true on all the architectures we currently support, but in the future we should either check that this is true or remove the assumption. The easiest way is probably just to assert somewhere in the configure script that (in C++11)
static_assert(std::is_trivially_constructible<std::atomic<std::uintptr_t>>::value, "Trivially initializable atomics are required.")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: