You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now i understand that this may have something to do with GREASE. My question is should I just add 21 to the end of the extensions ALWAYS, when there is a value in the extensions (or ciphers) that is in the GREASE table? Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Interestingly Akamai has been adding "-g" to the end of the md5 hash when the client sends the grease ciphersuites. Akamai also doesn't document that the the "tag" field they capture is the ja3 digest. May be useful to anyone using some of Akamai's products. ;-)
I have the folliowing ja3/ja3 digests for a pcap I analyzed:
Now using fingerprintls tool for the same pcap, i have this data:
For the extensions part of ja3:
I noticed that there's an additional 21 value that was added because looking at the fingerprintls output for extensions, the final element is 0x000A:
Now i understand that this may have something to do with GREASE. My question is should I just add 21 to the end of the extensions ALWAYS, when there is a value in the extensions (or ciphers) that is in the GREASE table? Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: