We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When loading cl-autowrap/libffi, I get an error about not being able to open the shared library "libffi"
Latest libffi by default will build out as libffi-6
If you see CFFI's libffi loading, their form looks like this:
(define-foreign-library (libffi) (:darwin (:or "libffi.dylib" "libffi32.dylib" "/usr/lib/libffi.dylib")) (:solaris (:or "/usr/lib/amd64/libffi.so" "/usr/lib/libffi.so")) (:openbsd "libffi.so") (:unix (:or "libffi.so.6" "libffi32.so.6" "libffi.so.5" "libffi32.so.5")) (:windows (:or "libffi-6.dll" "libffi-5.dll" "libffi.dll")) (t (:default "libffi")))
(see here)
Autowrap's looks like this:
(cffi:define-foreign-library libffi (:darwin (:or (:framework "libffi") (:default "libffi"))) (:unix "libffi.so") (:windows "libffi.dll") (t (:default "libffi"))) (cffi:use-foreign-library libffi)
I think autowrap should use the same form CFFI does, for completeness
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
When loading cl-autowrap/libffi, I get an error about not being able to open the shared library "libffi"
Latest libffi by default will build out as libffi-6
If you see CFFI's libffi loading, their form looks like this:
(see here)
Autowrap's looks like this:
I think autowrap should use the same form CFFI does, for completeness
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: