You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As it is now, joint q3 (which follows q2.5) starts next to its joint limit position both in the STL models (bad, might entail rendering the binaries again) and the default OR environment (can be sorted out). This may lead to issues with the newly added limit checks in our general-purpose cartesian controller: roboticslab-uc3m/kinematics-dynamics#161 (comment). The AmorCartesianControl device is not affected, but simulation involves BasicCartesianControl instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At least via <jointvalues>, you will get a warning if out of limits on init, then joint values are applied, and if wrong, you'll get a double warning. This is, even if within limits, you'll always get the first warning.
As it is now, joint q3 (which follows q2.5) starts next to its joint limit position both in the STL models (bad, might entail rendering the binaries again) and the default OR environment (can be sorted out). This may lead to issues with the newly added limit checks in our general-purpose cartesian controller: roboticslab-uc3m/kinematics-dynamics#161 (comment). The AmorCartesianControl device is not affected, but simulation involves BasicCartesianControl instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: