-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for DataProperty, ObjectProperty and AnnotationProperty declarations #9
Comments
Supporting these clauses would be great. As a first step I'd suggest taking the class and individual declaration integration tests at: as a baseline to create three new renderer test classes for object, data and annotation property declarations, with about ~30 tests each. The text renderer should also be extended to include the basic form of these tests. It will be a lot of tests to write (~150) but if all the new tests pass then we can have some confidence of reasonable coverage and robustness. |
Hey, any updates on this matter? I'm having a BIG need on creating ObjectProperties into my ontology and looks like it's not done yet. Am i right? |
This feature would be really useful if implemented. |
Has this feature been implemented yet. I see the original request is almost 8 years old. This feature would be extremely useful for my use case. |
Unfortunately, we have not had the time/funding to complete this functionality. It may still happen at some point in the future but we can not commit to a timeline. |
See user request on the mailing list:
http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Cellfie-Functions-td4665308.html#a4665359
See also:
https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/#Quick_Reference
https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/#dataPropertyFrame
https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/#objectPropertyFrame
https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/#annotationPropertyFrame
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: