Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2019. It is now read-only.

Define mapping from PomBase PAF #67

Open
cmungall opened this issue May 23, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Define mapping from PomBase PAF #67

cmungall opened this issue May 23, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Member

http://www.pombase.org/submit-data/phenotype-data-bulk-upload-format

This is quite flexible and could become an official TSV format for PXF (although the json/yaml will still be canonical)

cc @ValWood

@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented May 23, 2016

One problem with this format..... We have been able to capture everything for single gene
but it doesn't handle multi-gene alleles (if we want to capture all of the contributing gene IDs)

So we have another file for this soon:
pombase/pombase-chado#496

So far none of our users have requested to download the multi-gene phenotypes file...most are interested in single gene phenotypes so there might be advantages to having in separate files.

Any other suggestions welcome.

@mah11

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

cmungall commented May 24, 2016

The way that would be most aligned with phenopackets is to make an entity identifier for the genotype object, @mbrush can give you some examples

EDIT ok, so that wouldn't quite work with PAF as it already hardwires certain fields to be gene, allele etc, it's kind of a PAF and a GtAF

@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented May 25, 2016

can we have a call about this when Midori is back.

We can do multiple formats. We need to maintain a simple one per line gaf style format for single-gene phenotypes for our biological end users who like excel... otherwise flexible

@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented May 25, 2016

File also for AmiGO loading :)

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

cmungall commented Jun 7, 2016

Note WB are doing something similar, but with GAFs: https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/1778

@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented Jun 9, 2016

Note that we are only trying to create a GAF for AMiGO loading,
pombase/pombase-chado#543
but this will not have all of the information or there is no exact equivalent

It would be useful if we could come up with a generic phenotype exchange format which would capture everything that is required (for biological end users, and for bulk submissions).

I had a quick look and don't fully understand all of the WormBase fields and I guess any format needs to be able to cope with precomposed phenotype ontology terms like ours and post composed EQ stuff like WormBase.

Would it be useful to have a discussion with you @khowe @kyook @mah11 and other interested to see if we can come up with a common GAF equivalent
(we call our PHAF http://www.pombase.org/downloads/phenotype-annotations)

@kyook
Copy link

kyook commented Jun 9, 2016

Hi All,

I've been looking at our phenotype_annotations GAF with the goal of
updating it with attributions that are missing, such as anatomy, molecule,
lifestage, etc. I've already asked Chris Mungall about the missing
information and he suggests these values go into column 16, but there is a
problem with missing gorelations information; we don't have those for
phenotype.

So, it would be very useful to have a discussion about changes we should
make to the file. Count me in!

Karen

Karen Yook

Curator
WormBase Caltech
Tel: 415.306.4150
e-mail: [email protected]
e-mail: [email protected]
skype name: wbkaren


On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Val Wood <[email protected]> wrote:

> Note that we are only trying to create a GAF for AMiGO loading,
> pombase/pombase-chado#543
> <https://github.com/pombase/pombase-chado/issues/543>
> but this will not have all of the information or there is no exact
> equivalent
>
> It would be useful if we could come up with a generic phenotype exchange
> format which would capture everything that is required (for biological end
> users, and for bulk submissions).
>
> I had a quick look and don't fully understand all of the WormBase fields
> and I guess any format needs to be able to cope with precomposed phenotype
> ontology terms like ours and post composed EQ stuff like WormBase.
>
> Would it be useful to have a discussion with you @khowe
> <https://github.com/khowe> @kyook <https://github.com/kyook> @mah11
> <https://github.com/mah11> and other interested to see if we can come up
> with a common GAF equivalent
> (we call our PHAF http://www.pombase.org/downloads/phenotype-annotations)
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/phenopackets/phenopacket-format/issues/67#issuecomment-224872283>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAlVGrWYVE_0rjr6tyrmFZLo8dScsTpVks5qJ_2fgaJpZM4Ik7Gt>
> .
>

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants