You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This project is currently under development, and we welcome feedback for further improvement. Below is a detailed explanation of the implementation, current progress, and areas for enhancement.
Overview
The implementation of gear meshing stiffness is based on the methodologies proposed by:
Sainsot et al. (2004): Focused on bidimensional analytical formulas considering gear body contributions.
Ma et al. (2014): Developed time-varying mesh stiffness calculations for cracked spur gears.
The gear tooth is modeled as a cantilever beam, and meshing stiffness is calculated at each contact position using the energy method. This approach enables precise modeling of the gear’s dynamic behavior.
Current Progress
Meshing Algorithm
The algorithm can evaluate a half-tooth profile to extract geometric parameters necessary for stiffness calculation. Below is an example of a half-tooth profile:
Stiffness Calculation
Examples of stiffness plots demonstrate the relationship between the angular displacement of the pinion (x-axis) and the stiffness of the meshing coupling (y-axis). These plots provide insights into the stiffness variations during gear rotation:
Precision Comparisons
Comparisons between the implemented algorithm and the results from both authors' methodologies indicate areas for refinement. Notably, errors tend to increase with gear tooth rotation. Addressing this issue is a current focus of our development efforts.
Examples of comparative error plots:
Integration with ROSS
Integration with other gear implementations in ROSS is not yet complete but is a key milestone we aim to achieve soon.
Challenges and Next Steps
Error Reduction: Refining the algorithm to minimize errors in calculating the contact point position between meshing teeth.
Integration: Seamlessly combining the stiffness calculation module with other ROSS functionalities.
Validation: Further benchmarking against established methodologies to ensure accuracy.
References
Ma, H., Song, R., Pang, X., & Wen, B. (2014) Time-varying mesh stiffness calculation of cracked spur gears. Engineering Failure Analysis, 44, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.05.018
Sainsot, P., Velex, P., & Duverger, O. (2004) Contribution of gear body to tooth deflections - A new bidimensional analytical formula. Journal of Mechanical Design, 126(4), 748–752. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1758252
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Gear Meshing Stiffness Implementation
Commit hash: 8925a74
This project is currently under development, and we welcome feedback for further improvement. Below is a detailed explanation of the implementation, current progress, and areas for enhancement.
Overview
The implementation of gear meshing stiffness is based on the methodologies proposed by:
The gear tooth is modeled as a cantilever beam, and meshing stiffness is calculated at each contact position using the energy method. This approach enables precise modeling of the gear’s dynamic behavior.
Current Progress
Meshing Algorithm
The algorithm can evaluate a half-tooth profile to extract geometric parameters necessary for stiffness calculation. Below is an example of a half-tooth profile:
Stiffness Calculation
Examples of stiffness plots demonstrate the relationship between the angular displacement of the pinion (x-axis) and the stiffness of the meshing coupling (y-axis). These plots provide insights into the stiffness variations during gear rotation:
Precision Comparisons
Comparisons between the implemented algorithm and the results from both authors' methodologies indicate areas for refinement. Notably, errors tend to increase with gear tooth rotation. Addressing this issue is a current focus of our development efforts.
Examples of comparative error plots:
Integration with ROSS
Integration with other gear implementations in
ROSS
is not yet complete but is a key milestone we aim to achieve soon.Challenges and Next Steps
ROSS
functionalities.References
Ma, H., Song, R., Pang, X., & Wen, B. (2014)
Time-varying mesh stiffness calculation of cracked spur gears.
Engineering Failure Analysis, 44, 179–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.05.018
Sainsot, P., Velex, P., & Duverger, O. (2004)
Contribution of gear body to tooth deflections - A new bidimensional analytical formula.
Journal of Mechanical Design, 126(4), 748–752.
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1758252
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: