Options page & structural redesign #150
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Open
|
Hey @pento, sorry to bother you with the ping, but I was wondering if you’ve had a chance to review this PR. If so, how should we proceed on this? Would love to work on it if you have any feedback. :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #147
It ended up as a big PR as involved a structural redesign.
Created an options page to bring more flexibility for each user. Added the template fregante/browser-extension-template as an initial setup.
Some initial options:
Also, added a few small improvements such as adding the
google.comdomain to the blocked list (as it's currently not working based on issue #148) and movinggithub.comfrom markdown to blocked list as that's now a native feature for their service.