You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, about the issue #25
it is mentioned that "Channel 1 already outputs only changes, so no need for the 'Item Changed' node." which is very useful feature, however it doesn't always reflect only item change output, as it outputs data each time flow is published as well.
Thus making it a bit unpredictable and quite difficult to work with, as the flow is also triggered when it is published, even thought "item" it self is not changed.
For that reason I am always forced to use second channel and complicate flow as mentioned on the linked ticket above, so perhaps a checkbox like "trigger on publish" or "trigger only on item value change" or something like that would be very beneficial.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not sure the answer to your question, states are persisted only in openhab in rrd4j database.
I now tried to reproduce what I described, but I do not manage to pinpoint the reason I decided to always use the second channel. It could be unrelated to the input node itself, its been a while.
If I remember correctly, something was triggering update (even if the item didn't update) and that was messing with my rules.
So, if I misunderstood something I guess the issue can be closed
If you use any kind of persistence, the items will get an ItemStateEvent from the persistence provider (e.g. rrd4j or InfluxDB) upon restart. I think this is the reason that you might get a Node-Red message even though the item state/value hasn't changed. You can always use the 'RBE' (Report by Exception) node to filter out event without changing the state of the item itself.
Hi, about the issue #25
it is mentioned that "Channel 1 already outputs only changes, so no need for the 'Item Changed' node." which is very useful feature, however it doesn't always reflect only item change output, as it outputs data each time flow is published as well.
Thus making it a bit unpredictable and quite difficult to work with, as the flow is also triggered when it is published, even thought "item" it self is not changed.
For that reason I am always forced to use second channel and complicate flow as mentioned on the linked ticket above, so perhaps a checkbox like "trigger on publish" or "trigger only on item value change" or something like that would be very beneficial.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: