Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unrecognized layerType EMS_VECTOR_TILE #20

Open
kshartman opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Unrecognized layerType EMS_VECTOR_TILE #20

kshartman opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@kshartman
Copy link

kshartman commented Feb 5, 2024

Fresh install, the panel to the left of "Message Source Countries" says unrecognized layerType EMS_VECTOR_TILE. The panel to the right says there are 49 messages all from US. This is new so I don't have any RUF reports yet if that is what it wants. Is this a bug or is it waiting for some data I don't have yet?

image

@gitterdoneplease
Copy link

gitterdoneplease commented Feb 23, 2024

FWIW, my long-time working install is now showing this same error.

@RobMeerwijk
Copy link

Same here, I updated docker-compose.yml and switched to latest versions of kibana and elastic. That solved the issue.

@gitterdoneplease
Copy link

I updated my Kibana and Elasticsearch 8.12.2 and the map does in fact work again! Thanks!

@patschi
Copy link
Owner

patschi commented Feb 24, 2024

It looks like the parsedmarc dashboard file has changed, requiring some newer layer types only newer kibana versions can provide. Updating to e.g. 8.12.2 fixes it indeed.

I am adding a note in the README for awareness.

I'm not yet sure how to handle such scenarios when updating from older installations...

@patschi patschi added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 24, 2024
@kshartman
Copy link
Author

Updating to 8.12.2 also fixed it for me. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants