Possible to blacklist packages?

[mathomp4]

I was wondering if it's possible with brew to "blacklist" packages? The main reason I ask is that I do code development on my Macbook and I like to control my compilers by building them myself and maintaining Lua modules to enable them.

Thus, I tend to be very careful and never let brew install gcc since I want to maintain that myself and make sure it's not in my "default" path (which has the brew bin). I have to live with clang being in my default PATH, but gcc only appears when I ask it to.

But the fun part is when I do a brew install foo and find it wants gcc and boom, I now have gcc-11 or whatever in my path. I try to look at brew info foo first, but sometimes I see a cool new package and get impatient. 😄

So I wondered, is there a way to tell brew "never install gcc or any package that depends on it"? I don't mind losing out on some packages if it means I can keep my control.

[SMillerDev]

You could just install it and brew unlink gcc, that way it won't show up in your path.

[mathomp4]

Hmm. I hadn't thought of that...

[pan3793]

You could just install it and brew unlink gcc, that way it won't show up in your path.

This is a workaround, we still need to install the unused deps and upgrade them when run brew upgrade. Is there any concerns to add a blacklist feature?

[pan3793]

I'm also looking forward to this feature, lots of Java softwares have been declared depend on openjdk, but most of them can not work with the latest version of openjdk, e.g. Homebrew/homebrew-core#98294

[agenslerDNA]

I also would love to see this feature. I'm running into the exact same type of scenarios. I find myself having to fix my environment more and more, so a way to blacklist would be a great QOL addition.

[SMillerDev]

Alternatively, submitting pull requests to ensure the tests for formulae actually catch the version issues in CI make the Homebrew packages better for everyone.