Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

second video feedback #34

Open
jcolomb opened this issue Jan 14, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

second video feedback #34

jcolomb opened this issue Jan 14, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@jcolomb
Copy link
Member

jcolomb commented Jan 14, 2019

Feedback for https://rdmpromotion.rbind.io/blog/2018/11/02/a-video-about-open-data-as-a-new-standard/ v.2

From Petra (Jena RDM team)

video

0:46 This shadow man looks eerie. Isn’t there somebody else? Or sth more positive? A flying bird for example?

slides

2:46 Dryad _> Dryad Digital Repository ?

2:52 dryad spelled with lower case, before it was Dryad. Make spelling consistent, also for the other repositories.

3:02 “Standardized” is British English, before you have been using AE. Make it consistent. These three sentences should consistently start with capitals and end with a period.

3:05 Use a -> delete “a”

I wonder: what are vocabularies (and I would not use it in plural form) that follow “fair” principles? Do you mean clear and transparent language? Well-defined terms/terminology?

3:14 “with a plurality” -> with a wealth of? variety of?

3:19 associated with detailed provenance -> information of provenance

text

0:46 spoken: should, written; shall. Should is correct.

0:54 spoken: “only while open” correct
“potential” , written: potention, correct is spoken

1:38 spoken: chance, written: chances. Written is correct

1:42 text disappears too fast to be read, it is also in too small letters. I would split it into two parts (at least)

1:42 spoken: or funded, written: and funded -> choose written

1:48 spoken: and NOW they , written: - both is possible, but maybe better keep it short

2:13 “happen in a swing” – I never heard this expression. It is also not in pons.de

2:26 “at the end, Research” -> IN the end, research

2:32 Researcher -> researchers (Kleinschreibung und Plural-S)
2:33 „to gear data“ -> – I never heard this expression. It is also not in pons.de
2:36 the -> they
2:37 “.” at the end of the sentence

Is it intented that there is no spoken text here?

Generally:
• Please make sure that the size of the letters remains the same.
• Please end every sentence with a period.
• A native speaker of English should proof-read the text.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant