Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[flagd] Update in-process resolver to support flag metadata #1115

Closed
toddbaert opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1151
Closed

[flagd] Update in-process resolver to support flag metadata #1115

toddbaert opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1151
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@toddbaert
Copy link
Member

toddbaert commented Dec 11, 2024

With this schema change, flag metadata can now be stored in flag configuration files. Specifically, these can contain things like version and flag set id information so that consumers can use this data in flag evaluations, caching, telemetry etc.

We need to add this metadata into flags which are evaluated by in-process resolvers. Essentially, we need to take the new properties from the flag definition and include them in metadata returned in the flag resolution.

Acceptance criteria:

  • metadata defined in flag configuration (specifically id and version) are returned from any flag resolved from this set
  • associated tests
@toddbaert toddbaert changed the title a [flagd] Update in-process resolver to support flag metadata Dec 11, 2024
@toddbaert toddbaert added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Dec 11, 2024
@toddbaert
Copy link
Member Author

@beeme1mr assigning this to you for now since you're at least partially working on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants