Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Eliminate use of usim in instrumentation-kit tests; make tests run faster by acquiring smaller images in test_acquisition_panel_acquisition #175

Open
cmeyer opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Eliminate use of usim in instrumentation-kit tests; make tests run faster by acquiring smaller images in test_acquisition_panel_acquisition #175

cmeyer opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
audience - developer affects internal development or blocks another issue effort - day a day or less good first issue good for newcomers impact - medium has straightforward but non-obvious workaround reach - medium affects several users weekly

Comments

@cmeyer
Copy link
Collaborator

cmeyer commented Feb 22, 2024

No description provided.

@cmeyer cmeyer added good first issue good for newcomers impact - medium has straightforward but non-obvious workaround stage - ready reach - medium affects several users weekly audience - developer affects internal development or blocks another issue effort - day a day or less priority - medium automated priority tag and removed medium priority priority - medium automated priority tag labels Feb 23, 2024
@cmeyer cmeyer removed the priority - medium automated priority tag label Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
audience - developer affects internal development or blocks another issue effort - day a day or less good first issue good for newcomers impact - medium has straightforward but non-obvious workaround reach - medium affects several users weekly
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cmeyer