You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, specifying 'depth' to qFlex instead of using the auto-computed depth will result in an error, since it doesn't actually limit the number of cycles processed from the circuit file.
This will probably be simplest to fix after #115 is completed - until then, documenting this issue in the help message should be enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agreed. Let me change the title to be more informative.
s-mandra
changed the title
Optional 'depth' parameter is non-functional
Optional 'depth' parameter does not limit the actual depth of circuit.
Oct 22, 2019
At the moment, users cannot specify the depth so I declassify this as improvement rather than bug.
s-mandra
changed the title
Optional 'depth' parameter does not limit the actual depth of circuit.
Add 'depth' parameter to limit the actual depth of circuit.
Jan 23, 2020
Currently, specifying 'depth' to qFlex instead of using the auto-computed depth will result in an error, since it doesn't actually limit the number of cycles processed from the circuit file.
This will probably be simplest to fix after #115 is completed - until then, documenting this issue in the help message should be enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: