Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Off-box validation of <running> containing templates must be possible #14

Open
kwatsen opened this issue Dec 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@kwatsen
Copy link

kwatsen commented Dec 1, 2024

Expectation is that clients would perform the template-expansion step prior to using a validator (just like the servers do)

@RobertPeschi
Copy link

RobertPeschi commented Dec 2, 2024

->Expectation is that clients would perform the template-expansion step prior to using a validator (just like the servers do)
Note also that since a template contains a configuration matching the one of a typical actual sub-bsystem (as defined in draft-rajaram-yang-config-template-framework-00), it could likely be pre-validated alone, prior being applied to actual sub-system. This "done-once-for-all" template validation might accelerate the validation of each sub-system expanded data ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants