We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Today I happened to know that https://github.com/mujin/mujinplanningclientpy/blob/master/python/mujinplanningclient/binpickingplanningclient.py#L354 IsRobotOccludingBody signature is different from current planningcommon realtimerobottask3.py's signature, where sensorSelectionInfos needs to be used, not cameraname.
There should be some others, so please check robottask and fix the planningclient signature accordingly.
/cc @ntohge
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I wander - how comes we only noticed it now? Was IsRobotOccludingBody never used before?
IsRobotOccludingBody
Sorry, something went wrong.
@andriymujin maybe mujinsimulator is the only user
sent mujinsimulator side MR, can use that for total testing
felixvd
andriymujin
No branches or pull requests
Today I happened to know that https://github.com/mujin/mujinplanningclientpy/blob/master/python/mujinplanningclient/binpickingplanningclient.py#L354 IsRobotOccludingBody signature is different from current planningcommon realtimerobottask3.py's signature, where sensorSelectionInfos needs to be used, not cameraname.
There should be some others, so please check robottask and fix the planningclient signature accordingly.
/cc @ntohge
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: