Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Better Combat integration for Atomic Disassembler and Meka-Tool. #718

Open
v3xed-v0id opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@v3xed-v0id
Copy link

Describe the feature you'd like

I would like Better Combat support for a couple of the mekanism weapons, specifically the Atomic Disassembler and Meka-Tool. (the rest of the tools/weapons including paxels are supported by default, as Better Combat adds automatic support to modded vanilla-like tools and weapons)

Describe alternatives you've considered

I am not aware of any alternatives, I suppose a third-party might be able to add integration via a secondary mod, although I am not a modder (I would not be said third-party), and I dont believe that adding better combat integration would be that difficult for the mekanism devs to integrate. (I think that even some of the preset animations might work for at least the Atomic Disassembler [greataxe/hammer preset? i was thinking it would be a two-handed weapon considering it's size], not sure if any may work for the Meka-Tool, though im sure you can test out and see if a preset would work)

Additional context

The Better Combat mod is a mod that expands upon vanilla combat by adding things like dual-wielding, two-handed weapons, weapon combos, extended weapon reach, and weapon attack animations. Adding support for this mod would make the Atomic Disassembler and Meka-Tool integrate with this mod's playstyle and give players more options in how they wish to play their game. Currently only the "vanilla+" tools this mod adds, such as the ingot axes, swords, and paxels, have support for this mod (as Better Combat adds automatic support for these). I hope that this feature request has consideration.

Thank you for reading.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant