selection criteria and specs to be added

[Sakurann]

I was wondering what was the selection criteria among DIF specs: Presentation exchange and .well-known included, but not Universal Resolver or did-siop, for example. I would add did-siop next to DIDComm.

[Sakurann]

another good resource as a source of specs is https://whimsical.com/decentralized-mapping-exercise-CUhk3dT4RUZvGa4Lt7rNvD , an work product of DIF interoperability WG (sorry, if dups)

[manicprogrammer]

The only selection criteria was subjective selection for somewhere to draw the line for a v1 release of the diagram. I did specifically choose to leave out the SIOP because I needed to do more research on it's tree as it seemed it was in flux with a lot of work happening in groups outside of what I was calling the core groups for this document. That may not be right which is why some more research needed to be done. It's a major point and maybe an inflection point that needs its own map/sub-map with it at the center. Basically for SIOP I didn't feel I was ready to tackle it yet. :-)

I love the diagram you referenced. I can see v2 driving some of it's breakout based on that diagram.

[manicprogrammer]

This issue has been migrated to the new project location as an issue. It's new home is:
decentralized-identity/vc-spec-map#6