-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does running iterations of quickmerge on quickmerge output create artifacts? #56
Comments
I would be very cautious if I noticed sudden big jumps in contiguity that
did not happen with other merging steps. Use stringent ml or l to make sure
that sequences are not getting added due to repeats. You can also use an
alignment length filter (in delta-filter) to filter out small alignments.
If you see that couple of joins are increasing the contiguity and if you
suspect misjoins being the cause, you can inspect the merged contigs.
…On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:32 PM Eric Edsinger ***@***.***> wrote:
I have multiple assemblies of hybrid and long-read sequencing. And its
allowing me to run quickmerge on the output of quickmerge multiple times.
I'm seeing increases in contig lengths and N50 but wondering how much of
this might be due to artifacts. I'm guessing artifacts are unlikely in
cases of gap filling - but is quickmerge able to add sequence onto the ends
of contigs - in which case, maybe artifacts might arise over iterations of
quickmerge use...?
Thank you :)
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#56>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABZQH2BBNWMWX3Y3YDFHEWLRR5ZB3ANCNFSM4NDHHQAA>
.
--
Mahul Chakraborty
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of California-Irvine
Phone: 949 824 9559
Fax: 949 824 9559
Website: https://mahulchakraborty.wordpress.com/
Github: https://github.com/mahulchak
|
I set l to N50 and ml to 10,000 - but maybe that is too low. I'll try to explore quickmerge output -still getting used to things like sam and delta files. Maybe I will just go with the likely best assembly after just one round of quickmerge. We will run Dovetail on things after scaffolding - so hopefully it can also fix misjoins by quickmerge. I have two hybrid and two long-read assemblies from 4 different assemblers. What if I were to pool 3 initial assemblies to act as the self-assembled long-read assembly - and then do a single round of quickmerge on the best of the initial hybrid assemblies....? Maybe this would let me leverage all the contiguity without inducing excessive artifacts from iterations of quickmerge. |
Sounds good.
I guess you could try that strategy. I have not tried that before so I will be curious to see what happens.
…On Sat, May 16, 2020, 22:48 Eric Edsinger ***@***.***> wrote:
I set l to N50 and ml to 10,000 - but maybe that is too low. I'll try to
explore things -still getting used to things like sam and delta files.
Maybe I will just go with the likely best after just one round of
quickmerge.
We will run Dovetail on things after scaffolding - so hopefully it can
also fix misjoins by quickmerge.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#56 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABZQH2B3Z2J3NU4F3WJP4DDRR53BFANCNFSM4NDHHQAA>
.
|
I have multiple assemblies of hybrid and long-read sequencing. And its allowing me to run quickmerge on the output of quickmerge multiple times. I'm seeing increases in contig lengths and N50 but wondering how much of this might be due to artifacts. I'm guessing artifacts are unlikely in cases of gap filling - but is quickmerge able to add sequence onto the ends of contigs - in which case, maybe artifacts might arise over iterations of quickmerge use...?
Thank you :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: