We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello. Thank you for opening your code and experience log.
While running your code to train SVHN, I found that training SVHN gives strangely high adversarial accuracy on test set.
Including your paper, SVHN usually shows adversarial accuracy near 55~60%.
However, when I run your code for 4 times with different seeds(0~3), 3 of them gives accuracy near 90%.
The only change I made on the original code is to add 3 lines at the begining of the code to assign GPU.
import os os.environ["CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER"] = "PCI_BUS_ID" os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"]="0" #can be "1", "2", "3"
I share the logs of that are trained so far.
(The trainings are not finished yet, but as you describe the "Best" performance also in the paper, strange best performance can be an issue)
output1.log output2.log output3.log output0.log
I never saw any paper that claims their adversarial accuracy on SVHN is near 90%. So I presume this is result of a bug but I am not certain.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe you should set pgd_alpha to 1 according to the log in this repo.
pgd_alpha
Sorry, something went wrong.
Same issue here.
No branches or pull requests
Hello. Thank you for opening your code and experience log.
While running your code to train SVHN, I found that training SVHN gives strangely high adversarial accuracy on test set.
Including your paper, SVHN usually shows adversarial accuracy near 55~60%.
However, when I run your code for 4 times with different seeds(0~3), 3 of them gives accuracy near 90%.
The only change I made on the original code is to add 3 lines at the begining of the code to assign GPU.
I share the logs of that are trained so far.
(The trainings are not finished yet, but as you describe the "Best" performance also in the paper, strange best performance can be an issue)
output1.log
output2.log
output3.log
output0.log
I never saw any paper that claims their adversarial accuracy on SVHN is near 90%. So I presume this is result of a bug but I am not certain.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: