Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The skos concepts do not belong to one ontology, they are defined like separate ontologies. #32

Open
Polymnia opened this issue Feb 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

The skos concepts do not belong to one ontology, they are defined like separate ontologies. #32

Polymnia opened this issue Feb 12, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Polymnia
Copy link

This becomes obvious from the different prefix per class.
@julianrojas87
Copy link
Owner

Indeed, this was defined this way anticipating that the different taxonomies will be eventually published and managed independently. But for the current pilot stage they were all placed under a single ontology definition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@julianrojas87 @Polymnia