You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This gene product leads to an induction of inflammation due to its recognition by an innate immune receptor. The receptor should be specified if this is used to annotate a particular sequence.
Bacterial flagellin is a ligand for mammalian TLR5.
Spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be a ligand for TLR2 [PMID33758854], and maybe TLR4 as well [PMID33644468]. The question is whether this is "natural" and benefits the host? Or is it an example of viral manipulation of the receptor for its own ends? There are both bacterial and viral examples of this--many of them, but these should be classified under: PATHGO_0000233 (disrupts host toll-like receptor signaling) AND PATHGO_0000176 (regulation of host receptor activity)
Textual definition
These parasite sequences are natural/evolved ligands for host microbial-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) receptors. These host receptors include membrane-bound Toll-like receptors (TLRs), cytoplasmic NOD-like receptors (NLRs), membrane-bound C-type lectin receptors, cytoplasmic absent in melanoma 2-like receptors (AIM2) and retinoic acid-inducible gene-I-like receptors (RLRs). See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298609/. Many of these do not ligate proteins but rather recognize nucleic acid sequences in odd places in the cell, or carbohydrates, or lipids, or combinations thereof.
The ligation event is one that is "meant" to happen by the host. It leads to host cell recognition of the presence of a trespassing microbe and results in the activation of proinflammatory signaling and host transcription to make the intracellular environment, and, eventually, the extracellular environment, less hospitable for the interloper.
Suggested parent term
I am not sure where to put this. "Mechanism of pathogenicity" does not seem appropriate as this event is something intended to restore homeostasis, though it will disrupt things in the short term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
genegodbold
changed the title
New term: Induces inflammation in another organism by agonizing an innate immune receptor
New term: Induces inflammation in another organism by agonizing an innate immune pattern recognition receptor
Jun 15, 2022
This gene product leads to an induction of inflammation due to its recognition by an innate immune receptor. The receptor should be specified if this is used to annotate a particular sequence.
Bacterial flagellin is a ligand for mammalian TLR5.
Spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be a ligand for TLR2 [PMID33758854], and maybe TLR4 as well [PMID33644468]. The question is whether this is "natural" and benefits the host? Or is it an example of viral manipulation of the receptor for its own ends? There are both bacterial and viral examples of this--many of them, but these should be classified under: PATHGO_0000233 (disrupts host toll-like receptor signaling) AND PATHGO_0000176 (regulation of host receptor activity)
Textual definition
These parasite sequences are natural/evolved ligands for host microbial-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) receptors. These host receptors include membrane-bound Toll-like receptors (TLRs), cytoplasmic NOD-like receptors (NLRs), membrane-bound C-type lectin receptors, cytoplasmic absent in melanoma 2-like receptors (AIM2) and retinoic acid-inducible gene-I-like receptors (RLRs). See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6298609/. Many of these do not ligate proteins but rather recognize nucleic acid sequences in odd places in the cell, or carbohydrates, or lipids, or combinations thereof.
The ligation event is one that is "meant" to happen by the host. It leads to host cell recognition of the presence of a trespassing microbe and results in the activation of proinflammatory signaling and host transcription to make the intracellular environment, and, eventually, the extracellular environment, less hospitable for the interloper.
Suggested parent term
I am not sure where to put this. "Mechanism of pathogenicity" does not seem appropriate as this event is something intended to restore homeostasis, though it will disrupt things in the short term.
Attribution
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-4690
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: