Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KSampler Adv node doesn't work properly with Latent From Batch core node #262

Open
phazei opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@phazei
Copy link

phazei commented Nov 13, 2024

I've been using the Latent From Batch node to cycle through images when I find something close to what I want since using the same seed and going through the latent batch space provides very similar photos. I had this set up and working with the default KSampler Advanced. I just switched to the efficiency one, and things were working fine until I tried to increase the Latent From Batch batch_index. When that value changes, it doesn't seem to trigger a change in the KSampler and just outputs the previous response without processing. I have it hooked up to an increment primitive, so every time I hit queue, it should be shifting the batch_index up one and generating a new image. If I want it to re-generate, I need to change something else, like if I change the Latent From Batch length, just moved it up, generate, movie it down, then it seems to properly generate with the right batch_index.

Attached is a simplified workflow showing this issue.

EfficiencyKSamplerAdvNodeBugWLatent

@phazei
Copy link
Author

phazei commented Nov 13, 2024

Ah, this seems to be a duplicate of #180

@jags111 jags111 self-assigned this Nov 24, 2024
@jags111 jags111 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants