You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Similar to link preview validators from Facebook and Twitter, IndieWebify.Me should have a validator that shows what meta tags are commonly understood. It would serve as a reference implementation of meta tag parsing broadly across the web but also what IndieWeb sites would use in reply contexts. It probably be tied to metaformats as the reference implementation/parsing spec.
It should highlight what values were understood (e.g. title, date, etc.) as well as show an example h-cite for how that might be rendered.
This validator could incorporate #104 and list which tags aren't needed.
This was discussed today at IndieWebCamp San Diego.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Similar to link preview validators from Facebook and Twitter, IndieWebify.Me should have a validator that shows what meta tags are commonly understood. It would serve as a reference implementation of meta tag parsing broadly across the web but also what IndieWeb sites would use in reply contexts. It probably be tied to metaformats as the reference implementation/parsing spec.
It should highlight what values were understood (e.g. title, date, etc.) as well as show an example h-cite for how that might be rendered.
This validator could incorporate #104 and list which tags aren't needed.
This was discussed today at IndieWebCamp San Diego.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: