Inclusive language check - expanded list of terms

[ajeanmahoney]

See inclusive_script.txt for a list of items our script currently checks for. These terms should be added to the list that DraftForge currently checks.

[NGPixel]

The current implementation provides alternatives as suggestions for each matched term:

{
    triggers: ['whitelist'],
    suggestion: 'allowlist or passlist'
  },
  {
    triggers: ['blacklist'],
    suggestion: 'denylist or blocklist'
  },
  {
    triggers: ['master'],
    suggestion: 'primary, main, host, leader or orchestrator'
  },
  {
    triggers: ['slave'],
    suggestion: 'secondary, replica, target, follower or worker'
  },
  {
    triggers: ['native'],
    suggestion: 'built-in'
  },
  {
    triggers: ['grandfather'],
    suggestion: 'exemption or approve'
  },
  {
    triggers: ['he/she', 'he or she'],
    suggestion: 'they'
  },
  {
    triggers: ['cripple', 'handicap'],
    suggestion: 'impair or impeded'
  }

Do you want to provide alternatives for the terms in the txt file? Or should a different function just match these extra terms without providing suggestions?

[ajeanmahoney]

The RPC doesn't update any terms that are flagged, we just pass them along to authors with the following question:

<!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online 
Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language>
and let us know if any changes are needed.  Updates of this nature typically
result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers.

[[ If the script flags some questionable terms or phrases, add:

For example, please consider whether the following should be updated: 
term A, term B, term C, etc.
]]

[[ If script flags any form of "tradition", frame as a clarity issue:

In addition, please consider whether "tradition" should be updated for clarity.  
While the NIST website 
<https://www.nist.gov/nist-research-library/nist-technical-series-publications-author-instructions#table1> 
indicates that this term is potentially biased, it is also ambiguous.  
"Tradition" is a subjective term, as it is not the same for everyone.
]]
-->

DraftForge doesn't need to provide alternatives to the RPC editors, and the editors don't provide alternatives to the authors unless they explicitly ask for suggestions.