-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch to ruff native formatter #186
Comments
By switching to ruff for style check and formatting, do you mean removing black? It looks like both black and ruff run to do style check in workflows and as in the instructions for contributing, running |
Yes, it means removing black and use only ruff. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity. |
Dear optimum-quanto maintainers, I saw black is still in the setup.sh and pyproject.toml, are we still considering switching? |
Yes, this is still planned, but no pull-request has been submitted yet. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
@dacorvo Submitted a pull request for this, please review and let me know. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
Done in #334 |
Ruff is faster than black and produces nearly identical results.
The goal of this issue is to switch to ruff for the style check and formatting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: