We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I use eslint (typescritp-eslint) and specifically some rules like:
no-unused-vars an ban-ts-comment
no-unused-vars
ban-ts-comment
I would argue that types such as EntryPoints.Client.fieldChanged should be defined as:
EntryPoints.Client.fieldChanged
type fieldChanged = (scriptContext?: fieldChangedContext) => void;
and that perhaps even:
interface fieldChangedContext { currentRecord: N_record.ClientCurrentRecord; sublistId: string; fieldId: string; line: number; column: number; } type fieldChanged = (scriptContext?: fieldChangedContext) => void;
could be:
interface fieldChangedContext { currentRecord?: N_record.ClientCurrentRecord; sublistId?: string; fieldId?: string; line?: number; column?: number; } type fieldChanged = (scriptContext?: fieldChangedContext) => void;
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I use eslint (typescritp-eslint) and specifically some rules like:
no-unused-vars
an
ban-ts-comment
I would argue that types such as
EntryPoints.Client.fieldChanged
should be defined as:and that perhaps even:
could be:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: