-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking issue for adding CPO/LPO tracking and development to aspect #3885
Comments
Wow, this is ambitious! Looking forward to seeing this move forwards! |
It took ~3.5 years, but the CPO plugins are now part of ASPECT and tested 🎉 I still need to add documentation on how to use it and add some benchmarks, but @magmaxt was planning to help me with that so that hopefully won't take another 3.5 years ;) |
I am very grateful about the mentorship from @MFraters @gassmoeller @bangerth @tjhei on how to get started at the ASPECT hackathon !! |
Lattice/Crystal Preferred Orientation (LPO/CPO, they are different names for the same) is a useful tool to be able to compare against seismic anisotropy data, and can give us a more direct link to mantle flow. It could also be used in the future to make anisotropic viscosities.
It has been a bit of a process of getting this into aspect, but I think it is final near the level to start making pull requests (note that is may still take a bit for the first pull request is made). To make the review process a bit more easy, I will split up the pull requests in several parts. This issue is to keep track of them and discuss if a different cut up of the pull request is needed. Each part will contain their own tests, although there will be some overlap in some tests besides the dependencies given in each point, which will be address along the way, tracked by point 6.
Related changes and fixes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: