Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding UniProt IDs? #799

Open
moghelab opened this issue Oct 28, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Adding UniProt IDs? #799

moghelab opened this issue Oct 28, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@moghelab
Copy link

moghelab commented Oct 28, 2022

Newbie here. I followed an older discussion here: #471 that suggests that adding data about at least some UniProt IDs should be possible. However, I tried retrieving this entry using the Noctua Form Editor (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A193BL32/entry) but it doesn't load in the GP cell. From what I understand from the discussions here, the entry has to be in the Neo database and I am not sure which aspects of Uniprot entries have been loaded into Neo. I work in plants and I can retrieve proteins from Arabidopsis using their TAIR-assigned IDs (ATxGXXXXX) but I am not sure how to add MF/BP annotations to other proteins not from model organisms?

Are only UniProtKB entries enabled? Am I not able to add because the above entry is in TrEMBL (unreviewed)? If the latter, is this functionality under consideration? Ability to add GOs for TrEMBL entries would be super-useful because it would reduce the curation bottleneck at UniprotKB for plants. A lot of the TrEMBL entries have been experimentally characterized and have a published manuscript associated with them, but have not had the chance to be reviewed yet, which can take a very long time.

@vanaukenk
Copy link

vanaukenk commented Oct 31, 2022

Hi @moghelab

Thanks for your questions about UniProtKB entries in Noctua. You are correct in that, right now, the entities need to be available in the NEO ontology for annotation in Noctua. And currently, we include the reviewed Swiss-Prot entries in NEO, but not the TrEMBL entries.

We'll discuss with the GO PIs (hopefully tomorrow) what would be needed to bring more TrEMBL entries into NEO to facilitate curation of other organisms that may not have their proteins reviewed yet. We don't want this to be a bottleneck for your curation.

Thanks,
--Kimberly

@moghelab
Copy link
Author

moghelab commented Nov 3, 2022

Hi, @vanaukenk I wonder if you have any suggestions on how to proceed on this (assuming this was discussed at the PI meeting)? Thanks!

@vanaukenk
Copy link

Hi @moghelab thanks for checking back in.
Would you be able to supply us with a list of TrEMBL accessions that you'd like to have available, at least in the near term?

@moghelab
Copy link
Author

moghelab commented Nov 3, 2022

Yes, I can! Should I email them somewhere?

@vanaukenk
Copy link

Hi @moghelab
I just sent you an email so you can send me the list of accessions and I'll forward them on to the GO software team. Thx.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants