You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 7, 2020. It is now read-only.
"indirectly activates" which might be the correct term to use?
The use of the word indirect here worries me a little because in general when biologists say some effect us "indirect" it isn't usually regulatory at all in a normal cell, its just an effect of breaking an upstream process.
The outcome of the first question will be important for geneontology/go-ontology#12859
because it will provide the mechanism in traditional annotation to continue to capture some of the information which is currently represented on the the single step process terms (this might be a pombase hack anyway, but if we know which relations to use we can fix).
It is correct to use regulates for 'unknown steps, incomplete pathway' (although strictly it is the activity of the substrate that is regulated, not the substrate).
then I also see
"indirectly activates" which might be the correct term to use?
This relation should be deprecated.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
@ukemi @vanaukenk would this match what you would do in LEGO?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: