You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@beckybanbury,
I'm noting a mismatch between dominant.veg and veg.notes for some of the records in SRDB. Fore example, BOREAS NSA-D1995 (measurement.ID 20484) is listed as 2TD with species Picea mariana; Pinus banksiana; Populus tremuloides. Based on these species, it should be 2TM.
Could you please scan some more to see how pervasive this problem is? Please check the original SRDB data (field indicating deciduous/ evergreen). Try to determine whether this is a single error or a problem with the code. You may also consult with @ValentineHerr.
This relates to issue #187.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can answer for that particular example quickly.
It correspond to 2nd record in SRDB. Its leaf_habit is "Deciduous" and the script generates "2TD".
So this particular case is a problem in SRDB.
@beckybanbury,
I'm noting a mismatch between dominant.veg and veg.notes for some of the records in SRDB. Fore example, BOREAS NSA-D1995 (measurement.ID 20484) is listed as 2TD with species Picea mariana; Pinus banksiana; Populus tremuloides. Based on these species, it should be 2TM.
Could you please scan some more to see how pervasive this problem is? Please check the original SRDB data (field indicating deciduous/ evergreen). Try to determine whether this is a single error or a problem with the code. You may also consult with @ValentineHerr.
This relates to issue #187.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: