You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is not brainstorming ideas. If you have an idea you'd like to discuss, please open a new discussion on the lotus forum and select the category as Ideas.
I have a specific, actionable, and well motivated feature request to propose.
Lotus component
lotus daemon - chain sync
lotus fvm/fevm - Lotus FVM and FEVM interactions
lotus miner/worker - sealing
lotus miner - proving(WindowPoSt/WinningPoSt)
lotus JSON-RPC API
lotus message management (mpool)
Other
What is the motivation behind this feature request? Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
FIP 0085 is prototyped and can merge in go-state-types once we merge the nv23 banch. We need to test it.
Describe the solution you'd like
Migration test in lotus asserting the new state of f090. Setup f090 with a known key and spend before migration. Demonstrate that this does not work after migration.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
Just filing this so we don't forget
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey! Is it okay that I move the testing plan for this FIP into this issue #11939, so its easier to see all the testing surface we have covered for FIPs targeting nv23?
lotus msig inspect f090
ERROR: actor code is not multisig: account
I will close this ticket now, with the testing plan being moved to #11939. Only need a migration test in Lotus asserting the new state of f090 before we can 🟢 this for nv23.
Checklist
Ideas
.Lotus component
What is the motivation behind this feature request? Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
FIP 0085 is prototyped and can merge in go-state-types once we merge the nv23 banch. We need to test it.
Describe the solution you'd like
Migration test in lotus asserting the new state of f090. Setup f090 with a known key and spend before migration. Demonstrate that this does not work after migration.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
Just filing this so we don't forget
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: