Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why use RootNet rather than gt? #144

Open
Divenirelrn opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Why use RootNet rather than gt? #144

Divenirelrn opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@Divenirelrn
Copy link

Thanks for your great work! I have one confusion, in this project, label of abs_depth is obtained from rootnet when testing on RHD dataset, and in rootnet project, label of abs_depth is obtained from gt of RHD dataset(z-axis coord). So why not use gt of RHD dataset directly when testing on RHD dataset?

@mks0601
Copy link
Collaborator

mks0601 commented Aug 25, 2023

Sorry I can't get it. Could you clarify your question?

@Divenirelrn
Copy link
Author

Sorry, i didn't clarify my question. I am working on 3D hand pose estimation on RHD dataset, and i don't understand why abs_depth is obtained by RootNet. In this file: https://github.com/facebookresearch/InterHand2.6M/blob/main/data/RHD/dataset.py,between line 78 ~ 84,
image
, label of abs_depth is obtained from output of RootNet when testing on RHD dataset(line 80), and obtained from GT of RHD when training on RHD dataset(line 84) . Why not obtain label of abs_depth from GT of RHD directly when tesing on RHD, just like training phase?

@mks0601
Copy link
Collaborator

mks0601 commented Aug 25, 2023

assuming GT information during the testing stage is not fair.

@Divenirelrn
Copy link
Author

Ok, I get it. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants