Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pre-extracted EgoNLQ Features seem unavailable #15

Open
StOnEGiggity opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Pre-extracted EgoNLQ Features seem unavailable #15

StOnEGiggity opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@StOnEGiggity
Copy link

Hi, thanks for your work. I downloaded Pre-extracted EgoNLQ Features multiple times and failed when downloading 50% each time. Do you have any idea about that? Thank you.

@ShramanPramanick
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, Thanks for your interest in our work. I just tried to download the tgz file with EgoNLQ pre-extracted features, and it worked fine (as described here).

image

The tgz file requires ~40GB space. Will you please ensure if you have this much space available on your disk? Even if that does not work, I can upload the file into a drive and share it with you.

@StOnEGiggity
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply. I guess it may be related to the regional network (in Australia for now). It is better to provide a drive link. Thank you very much.

@StOnEGiggity
Copy link
Author

By the way, I am trying to extract features with the provided pre-trained model, I found some weight of Roberta Model were not initialized from the model checkpoint, such as "roberta.encoder.layer.10.alpha_t2i" and "roberta.encoder.layer.10.crossattention_t2i.output.dense.weight". Do you have any idea about this? Thank you.

@ShramanPramanick
Copy link
Contributor

I have now uploaded the EgoNLQ features into OneDrive. Please find them here. Please let me know if you can download it now.

Regarding your second question about extracting features yourself, please clarify which script you are running and show me your exact Python command so I can better understand and correctly assist you. Thanks!

@StOnEGiggity
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much~ I checked the code and found it is from the code ".from_pretrained". So it looks like no problem for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants