You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So that I know that the communication channel is authentic beyond doubt
Acceptance criteria
If I haved verified another user using another client (Web), I should see the verified mark on that user avatar. (everywhere the user avatar is shown?)
Verifying another user from EX is not in the scope of this issue.
Leads
Tech:
Design:
Size estimate
None
Dependencies
None
Out of scope
Nothing
Open questions
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
Perhaps clarify that while we do not plan to implement the verification process on EX, we want the "verification badge" to be shown consistently on EW and EX which means we have to let Aaron to think through how to do it - since EW already has a way to show it, but it is not exactly "on the avatar" there as well.
I think this is not something that is worth keeping track of it but rather do at the end of the invisible crypto track. I do not think it will cause much friction at the moment if it is missing on EX.
@BillCarsonFr you also brought up that on EW the approach we currently use to show someone is verified, is not super clear or consistent. I am happy to capture this problem on the roadmap so we would not forget about this, but it is clear that it is something that will be postponed to later.
Description
Acceptance criteria
If I haved verified another user using another client (Web), I should see the verified mark on that user avatar. (everywhere the user avatar is shown?)
Verifying another user from EX is not in the scope of this issue.
Leads
Size estimate
None
Dependencies
Out of scope
Open questions
Questions
Subtasks
Android
iOS
Rust
Other
Sign-off
Android
iOS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: