Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Refactor shape_id -> shape_handle for clearer name #1796

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

KyleAMathews
Copy link
Contributor

@KyleAMathews KyleAMathews commented Oct 4, 2024

Addresses one of the renames proposed in #1771

  • rename shapeId as well

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Deploy Preview for electric-next ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 773c2aa
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/electric-next/deploys/6720a4f508bb140008f97524
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1796--electric-next.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@KyleAMathews KyleAMathews marked this pull request as draft October 6, 2024 20:52
@msfstef msfstef marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 13:06
Copy link
Contributor

@msfstef msfstef left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@KyleAMathews I've rebased and fixed all the tests, so this should also be ready to merge

I do need to mention that this (and the other refactring PR #1798) might cause issues with rebasing with @kevin-dp multitenancy PR

@KyleAMathews
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah either way it'll be annoying to rebase... I don't care which way we go.

@balegas
Copy link
Contributor

balegas commented Nov 4, 2024

Is anything left in this PR? Let's merge it if not.

Needs to be coordinated with #1833

@thruflo
Copy link
Contributor

thruflo commented Nov 4, 2024

I want to say this is superseded by #1900. Although I'm not super hot on git foo so just to be clear: I rebased that PR on this one. So I'm not sure do we need to merge this PR if we merge that one, or not? I guess we can just merge #1900?

icehaunter added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
…params (#1900)

Included renames:
- `electric-chunk-last-offset` -> `electric-offset`
- `electric-next-cursor` -> `electric-cursor`
- `electric-shape-id` -> `electric-handle`
- `?shape_id` -> `?handle`

Added query parameter: `?table` instead of `/:table` in the path

Closes #1771, #1796, #1798

---------

Co-authored-by: Kyle Mathews <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: msfstef <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ilia Borovitinov <[email protected]>
@icehaunter
Copy link
Contributor

Superseded by #1900

@icehaunter icehaunter closed this Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants