We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If I'm not wrong, currently the where condition for the cursor values is built in this format:
where
where cursor_field1 > x and cursor_field2 > y
But we could use a composite value (when the fields are compared with same operator)?
where (cursor_field1, cursor_field2) > (x, y)
A composite is ordered left-to-right with further right fields only breaking ties.
So I think it is faster as the fields on the right are only compared in case of ties?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
If I'm not wrong, currently the
where
condition for the cursor values is built in this format:But we could use a composite value (when the fields are compared with same operator)?
A composite is ordered left-to-right with further right fields only breaking ties.
So I think it is faster as the fields on the right are only compared in case of ties?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: