Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Perf] Windows/x64: 10 Regressions on 1/16/2025 12:39:22 AM +00:00 #111671

Open
performanceautofiler bot opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
arch-x64 needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners os-windows runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner

Comments

@performanceautofiler
Copy link

Run Information

Name Value
Architecture x64
OS Windows 10.0.22631
Queue ViperWindows
Baseline 1ce82e73932b8bc98f6395b0169c21f17f71268b
Compare e71d737628c7b807aa12755dabe4eca40c40da7e
Diff Diff
Configs CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:micro

Regressions in System.Tests.Perf_Enum

Benchmark Baseline Test Test/Base Test Quality Edge Detector Baseline IR Compare IR IR Ratio
18.35 ns 25.49 ns 1.39 0.18 False
11.92 ns 18.75 ns 1.57 0.22 False
40.80 ns 45.57 ns 1.12 0.03 False
14.44 ns 25.43 ns 1.76 0.07 False
26.23 ns 32.70 ns 1.25 0.06 False
11.81 ns 13.93 ns 1.18 0.19 False
11.95 ns 20.26 ns 1.70 0.22 False
26.85 ns 29.92 ns 1.11 0.40 False
12.52 ns 14.54 ns 1.16 0.09 False
12.04 ns 20.85 ns 1.73 0.20 False

graph
graph
graph
graph
graph
graph
graph
graph
graph
graph
Test Report

Repro

General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md

git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'System.Tests.Perf_Enum*'

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_Flags(value: 32)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_NonFlags_Large(value: UppercaseLetter)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_Flags(value: Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_Flags(value: Yellow)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_Flags(value: Yellow, Blue)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_NonFlags_Large(value: Format)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_NonFlags_Large(value: OtherNotAssigned)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_NonFlags_Small(value: -1)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_NonFlags_Large(value: 42)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

System.Tests.Perf_Enum.ToString_NonFlags_Small(value: TopDirectoryOnly)

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

Docs

Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository

@performanceautofiler performanceautofiler bot added arch-x64 os-windows runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Jan 21, 2025
@DrewScoggins DrewScoggins transferred this issue from dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues Jan 21, 2025
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jan 21, 2025
@DrewScoggins DrewScoggins added tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark labels Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arch-x64 needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners os-windows runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants