You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
See if we can instantiate these objects based on data we already have (the org name and package ID) instead of fetching them from GitHub via API. This can reduce a lot of repeating calls in a bunch of different methods.
Both objects have the ability to "lazy-fetch themselves" ("complete") from GitHub if a property of them that was not pre-populated is needed, so this technique can probably work and be harmless, but we should still see if it can be done and if it can actually improve performance, or are we going to call __complete in any case regardless, and then the added complexity is not worth it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See if we can instantiate these objects based on data we already have (the org name and package ID) instead of fetching them from GitHub via API. This can reduce a lot of repeating calls in a bunch of different methods.
Both objects have the ability to "lazy-fetch themselves" ("complete") from GitHub if a property of them that was not pre-populated is needed, so this technique can probably work and be harmless, but we should still see if it can be done and if it can actually improve performance, or are we going to call
__complete
in any case regardless, and then the added complexity is not worth it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: