You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've added a number of new features this year that should be extremely helpful for desk review. I'd like to see the following added to the spreadsheets:
A sales validation indicator. Ideally, we could color invalid sales using conditional formatting. We may also want to include the flag type somehow
1-2 comparable PIN sales from the comps output, perhaps linking to a breakout with that sale and some details
An aggregate comparables score (avg score per PIN) from Comp finder based QC #42. Idea is to use this to prioritize/triage things for review
Reproduce the neighborhood-level breakouts from last year's sheets (added by Craig)
Sort prorated PINs by their shared tieback, where applicable
Let's check in with Valuations; it seems like this is already the case
Consider breaking up the spreadsheets for larger town into chunks i.e. North Lake View and South Lake View
Let's deliver the sheets and then gather feedback to define groups
Link out to the Card Detail sheet from the PIN Detail sheet if the PIN has >1 card
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add column for # of units. (I'd expect this to only have data for 211s and 212s. It's possible there are two types: res units and commercial units. If yes, then two columns makes sense.)
We've added a number of new features this year that should be extremely helpful for desk review. I'd like to see the following added to the spreadsheets:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: