You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-cpp20-and-the-std-cpp20-switch/#c20-no_unique_address , MSVC ignores [[no_unique_address]], but some versions provide [[msvc::no_unique_address]] and actually act on it (this has also been added to compatible compilers like clang-18+).
Would it make sense for BOOST_ATTRIBUTE_NO_UNIQUE_ADDRESS to expand to this attribute under the right conditions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
According to https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-cpp20-and-the-std-cpp20-switch/#c20-no_unique_address , MSVC ignores
[[no_unique_address]]
, but some versions provide[[msvc::no_unique_address]]
and actually act on it (this has also been added to compatible compilers like clang-18+).Would it make sense for BOOST_ATTRIBUTE_NO_UNIQUE_ADDRESS to expand to this attribute under the right conditions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: