You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We currently have client IP propagated down (over multiple proxies) to the RMQ instance. If we were to use amqpprox and retain the same functionality, we would need to have support for ingress proxy protocol on amqpprox side as well, for we can't position amqpprox on the edge. Due to the fact that our infrastructure supports only proxy protocol v2... well, that's why we would like to see in/out v2 support. 😃
Describe the solution you'd like
Implementation of proxy protocol on ingress so that amqpproxy could propagate the real client IP down the road... and while on it we would like to see support for v2 proxy protocol thrown in. 😄
Describe alternatives you've considered
We could forget about real client IPs, but that is unfortunately easier said than done. 🤷🏻♂️
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We currently have client IP propagated down (over multiple proxies) to the RMQ instance. If we were to use amqpprox and retain the same functionality, we would need to have support for ingress proxy protocol on amqpprox side as well, for we can't position amqpprox on the edge. Due to the fact that our infrastructure supports only proxy protocol v2... well, that's why we would like to see in/out v2 support. 😃
Describe the solution you'd like
Implementation of proxy protocol on ingress so that amqpproxy could propagate the real client IP down the road... and while on it we would like to see support for v2 proxy protocol thrown in. 😄
Describe alternatives you've considered
We could forget about real client IPs, but that is unfortunately easier said than done. 🤷🏻♂️
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: