You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This would aid (i) in the process of species identification, where some species are generally smaller (or bigger) than others, (ii) to quickly delete very small annotations (or below a designated body-size threshold), which are also more difficult to confidently, and consistently, identify , and (iii) to quickly check that some point data were not incorrectly recorded as a point instead of measured as a line (or vice versa) during manual image annotation.
By created_at date of the annotation label (which is not the default because this sorts by annotation ID/creation and not by annotation label ID/creation!).
By file, i.e. files are ordered by filename (default in the volume overview) and the annotations are then ordered by their IDs within a file. Example: file a with annotations 1 and 3, file b with annotations 2 and 4. The default sorting would display 1, 2, 3, 4. Ordering by file will display 1, 3, 2, 4.
We could implement a sorting mechanism for Largo. Possible ways dor sorting are:
By "patch prototype" to detect outliers (see Outlier detection #88).
By pixel size. Use case (quoted from email):
By
created_at
date of the annotation label (which is not the default because this sorts by annotation ID/creation and not by annotation label ID/creation!).By file, i.e. files are ordered by filename (default in the volume overview) and the annotations are then ordered by their IDs within a file. Example: file a with annotations 1 and 3, file b with annotations 2 and 4. The default sorting would display 1, 2, 3, 4. Ordering by file will display 1, 3, 2, 4.
By similarity Sort by similarity #125
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: