-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SFS 2.0: filament path, a design flaw - filament hits walls near output holes #46
Comments
I'm facing this issue heavily- I'm happy that it was already posted. |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
@2Balu2 @roykrikke |
Try rotating the sensor 180 degrees, and shove the filament in the other direction. |
Do you thinks its possible to disassemble the sensor and use a small drill bit to kind of create this funnel shape? |
I got update on my sensor and I was able to address all issues:
After those steps I do not see issues with inserting the filament like before. |
Thanks. I did use a dremel to create a smoother transition/bigger inlet. |
That's one big problem with SFS2.0 filament sensor. Pain to use.
Current design of output holes in filament path is like this:
Just a small diameter hole. That filament needs to hit in perfectly.
In my experience, especially when having longer PTFE tubes installed on both ends of SFS2.0 sensor it is almost impossible to push filament out via that hole. That's because even tiny curvature of filament (by that I mean just filament taken from spool - it won't be straight, it will take a shape of spool) or side tension on filament causes it to hit a wall on left/right side of that exit hole.
I have to unplug PTFE tube on "entry" side and manoeuvre filament blindly inside SFS2.0 sensor, so it finally hits the exit hole of the sensor. It's pure pain to do that each time.
Perhaps a funnel shape would be better, directing the filament from the edges and directing it towards the center of the exit hole.
(note - this is just to show of what shape I mean; so don't look at actual type of operation shown there in fusion cad software)
Consider such improvement on 2.1 iteration. That would have side effect of sensor not being bidirectional anymore but...
(In theory we could just improve and print own, better case for it but CAD model is broken (#45))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: