Factions having unequal placement sizes/bases

[MeSaber]

Description

I guess its fine in 90% of cases to have unequal building sizes, lrpcs are an example of unequal size where one faction can place and the other cant in many occasions, however on some maps there can be clear/strong advantage differences and im questioning if there really has to be that way.

Tundra V2 as an example:

On this map there would be a clear difference of one faction can make really strong seaHLTs and the other cant. The reason for this is cor seaHLT has a 'fatter/deeper' base? I dont know exactly why but its not placeable anywhere in this river, while arm seaHLT can be placed nearly everywhere:

Maybe not a big deal by any means but its one of the not so obvious 'why does it have to be like this?' moments where they ideally should be placeable at the exactly same spot or close to at least, in this scenario its near 100% for arm and 0% for cor in terms of using it as a strong defensive structure, abusing the 'terrain' (the river) to use sea units.

Expected Behaviour

Be able to place similar units independent of faction.

Actual Behaviour

Map advantage.

Unequal strengths of the factions. (Probably not intended)

Reproduction steps

No response

Other

No response